Stephen Wolfram

MARCH 7, 2022

One can view a symbolic expression such as f[g[x][y, h[z]], w] as a hierarchical or tree structure , in which at every level some particular “head” (like f ) is “applied to” one or more arguments. and at t steps gives a total number of rules equal to: &#10005. So how about logic, or, more specifically Boolean algebra ?

Mathematics 120

Mathematics Physics Computer Algebra 120

Stephen Wolfram

JUNE 28, 2023

And, yes, when you try to run the function, it’ll notice it doesn’t have correct arguments and options specified. As an example, here’s a small piece of code (from my An Elementary Introduction to the Wolfram Language ), shown in the default way it’s rendered in notebooks: But in Version 13.3 And now in Version 13.3 But in Version 13.3

Computer 118

Computer Calculus Construction Mathematics 118

Stephen Wolfram

MARCH 5, 2024

My first big success came in 1981 when I decided to try enumerating all possible rules of a certain kind (elementary cellular automata) and then ran them on a computer to see what they did: I’d assumed that with simple underlying rules, the final behavior would be correspondingly simple. Back in 1987—as part of building Version 1.0

Science 122

Science Sciences Computer Mathematics 122

Stephen Wolfram

NOVEMBER 10, 2021

For integers, the obvious notion of equivalence is numerical equality. For example, we know (as I discovered in 2000) that (( b · c ) · a ) · ( b · (( b · a ) · b )) = a is the minimal axiom system for Boolean algebra , because FindEquationalProof finds a path that proves it.

Physics 122

Physics Mathematics Computer Construction 122