This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Elementary students rarely encounter computer science or engineering, and advanced science courses in high school favor higher-income, non-minority students. In middle schools offering algebra, white students make up 50% of the attendees, but 58% of those enrolled in algebra classes. Changing placement policies.
In more explicit form we could write this as Equal [f[x_, y_], f[f[y_, x_],y_]] —where Equal ( ) has the “known meaning” of representing equality. and at t steps gives a total number of rules equal to: ✕. So how about logic, or, more specifically Boolean algebra ? ✕. ✕.
As an example, here’s a small piece of code (from my An Elementary Introduction to the Wolfram Language ), shown in the default way it’s rendered in notebooks: But in Version 13.3 But what if we ask a question where the answer is some algebraic expression? But in Version 13.3 Sometimes that’s easy to determine.
Instead, what happens is that the universe evolves by virtue of lots of elementary updating events happening throughout the network. The same is true of axioms for areas of abstract algebra like group theory—as well as basic Euclidean geometry (at least for integers). But at the lowest level in our models, time doesn’t work that way.
In observing the metamathematical universe the analogy is basically different possible kinds of theories or abstractions—say, algebraic vs. geometrical vs. topological vs. categorical, etc. With our concept of “elementary equivalencings” we have a way to measure both in terms of computational operations.
For integers, the obvious notion of equivalence is numerical equality. For example, we know (as I discovered in 2000) that (( b · c ) · a ) · ( b · (( b · a ) · b )) = a is the minimal axiom system for Boolean algebra , because FindEquationalProof finds a path that proves it.
My first big success came in 1981 when I decided to try enumerating all possible rules of a certain kind (elementary cellular automata) and then ran them on a computer to see what they did: I’d assumed that with simple underlying rules, the final behavior would be correspondingly simple.
Any integral of an algebraic function can in principle be done in terms of our general DifferentialRoot objects. there are now many integrals that could previously be done only in terms of special functions, but now give results in elementary functions. And a third of a century later—in Version 13.0—we’re it can: ✕.
or ) must for example be equal to 1 mod 2, 3 and 6. This structure is very dependent on the algebraic properties of. A few additional results are (where the decimals are algebraic numbers of degree 6, and a is a real number): ✕. How should we decompose that into “elementary events”? ✕. ✕.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 28,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content