Remove Calculus Remove Equality Remove Government Remove Mathematics
article thumbnail

Contending with the Unintended Consequences of History: Revisiting Brown v. Board of Education and the Need for Systemic Change in K-12 Education

National Science Foundation

The biases are notably stark if schools are divided out by minority enrollment, as public middle and high schools with more than 50 percent White students have only 2 percent of mathematics teachers and 1 percent of science teachers that are Black ( National Center for Science & Engineering Statistics ). In comparison to the U.S.

article thumbnail

Why Choose a STEM Career?

CTE Learning

stands for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. On the other hand, physical and biological sciences, mathematics, science technology, and agricultural sciences pay around $50,400 on average. With STEM, customary gender roles are broken, and it gives way to equality in every possible way. The acronym “S.T.E.M.”

STEM 52
educators

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Why Choose a STEM Career?

CTE Learning

” stands for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Mathematics is typically in every activity or occupation we do in life. On the other hand, physical and biological sciences, mathematics, science technology, and agricultural sciences pay around $50,400 on average. So what exactly is a STEM based career?

STEM 52
article thumbnail

Why Choose STEM? The Best STEM Careers for 2018

CTE Learning

stands for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. On the other hand, physical and biological sciences, mathematics, science technology, and agricultural sciences pay around $50,400 on average. With STEM, customary gender roles are broken, and it gives way to equality in every possible way. The acronym “S.T.E.M.”

STEM 40
article thumbnail

How Did We Get Here? The Tangled History of the Second Law of Thermodynamics

Stephen Wolfram

But by the end of the 1800s, with the existence of molecules increasingly firmly established, the Second Law began to often be treated as an almost-mathematically-proven necessary law of physics. There were still mathematical loose ends, as well as issues such as its application to living systems and to systems involving gravity.

Energy 88
article thumbnail

The Concept of the Ruliad

Stephen Wolfram

And—it should be said at the outset—we’re still only at the very beginning of nailing down those technical details and setting up the difficult mathematics and formalism they involve.) For integers, the obvious notion of equivalence is numerical equality. For hypergraphs, it’s isomorphism. Experiencing the Ruliad.

Physics 122
article thumbnail

Computational Foundations for the Second Law of Thermodynamics

Stephen Wolfram

How does one tie all this down with rigorous, mathematical-style proofs? But there’s really just one principle that governs all these things: that whatever method we have to prepare or analyze states of a system is somehow computationally bounded. Well, it’s difficult. This isn’t as such a statement of physics.